Skip to main content

API Quoting vs Email-Based Intake – When to Automate, When to Route

In 2025, MGAs and carriers aren’t debating whether to automate – they’re debating where. Should submissions be routed through email and OCR triage? Or pushed through a full-blown API quoting experience?

This blog breaks down when to use email-based intake (backed by AI + human ops), when to lean on API quoting, and how to blend both depending on your carrier connectivity, data hygiene, and scale.

The Case for API Quoting

Best For: Carriers with clean API access, program managers with known rules, low-friction LOBs

Pros:

  • Instant rate response, often <2s
  • No human review if data is clean
  • Can integrate with CRMs or front-end portals
  • Trackable – quote logs, success/fail records

Cons:

  • Only works with participating carriers
  • Can fail silently if data is malformed
  • Requires structured intake (forms, required fields)

The Case for Email-Based Intake + AI OCR

Best For: Broker submissions, multi-LOB programs, carriers without APIs

Pros:

  • Accepts real-world intake – binders, insurance app forms, spreadsheets
  • GPT + OCR classify and extract for quoting
  • More flexible for mid-market programs
  • Easier to onboard: works on day one with inbox + access

Cons:

  • Requires QA fallbacks
  • Slightly slower: 2-4 hour quoting SLA vs real-time API
  • Data inconsistency can increase triage effort

Selectsys Blends Both: Hybrid Quoting Layer

Scenario What Selectsys Uses
Retail broker sends email GPT classifier → RQB prep → BPO QA
API-ready submission via portal Direct RQB API call → return quote
PDF + intake form submission OCR → field extraction → quote trigger
Missing carrier appetite info Route to underwriter for decision

Test Case

Client: Mid-sized MGA with 12 programs, 4 API-enabled, 8 email-only

Before:

  • Quoting was 100% manual
  • 3 underwriters handled intake → quote prep → bind requests

After Selectsys:

  • API submissions routed directly through RQB
  • Non-API emails classified by GPT, triaged by Selectsys ops
  • Quote volume doubled with no increase in underwriter workload
  • Bind turnaround dropped from 2 days → under 8 hours

FAQs

Can I use RQB with both API and manual submissions?
Yes. RQB supports hybrid workflows – using APIs when available and fallback workflows (email, doc intake) when not.

What happens if the API fails or carrier doesn’t respond?
The quote is flagged, and a Selectsys underwriter or BPO team member follows up via manual quoting.

How do you handle different LOBs in the same submission?
RQB chains quotes by line – triggering API if supported, fallback to manual otherwise.

Do we need to format emails or attachments a certain way?
No. Our GPT classifier reads unstructured emails and attachments.

Can producers submit via portal instead of email?
Yes. We can embed RQB into portals or CRMs to trigger quotes automatically.


Automate Where You Can. Route Intelligently Where You Can’t.
Let Selectsys handle quoting with the right mix of API speed and human oversight.

Start a Pilot

Discover More: Download Our Free Brochure

Unlock the full potential of your insurance operations with our comprehensive suite of digital solutions. Download our brochure to learn how our innovative platforms can streamline underwriting, enhance data extraction, and improve policy management. Get insights into how SelectsysTech's AI-powered tools can transform your insurance business.